Prior to making checks with other agencies it is considered to be good practice to obtain permission from someone with parental responsibility, to carry out these checks. This permission is not necessary if to do so would place the child or another person at risk. The purpose of the checks with other agencies is to explore whether they have relevant information, and to further consider any information obtained in the light of the referral
Checks with other agencies generally take place at the MASH meetings.
Where can the child's needs be met?
The MASH meeting must decide whether the child's needs can be met by the provision of further services, taking into account the definition of 'in need' under Section 23 of The Children (Guernsey and Alderney) Law, 2008.
If the child's needs meet the criteria a children's social care Lead Professional will be identified and a single assessment Child's Plan will be conducted. Timescales for the assessment will be agreed between the social worker and their manager depending on circumstances of the case and the child's presenting needs.
If, during the assessment, it is suspected that a child is at risk of immediate harm, the social worker must follow the instructions contained in the step immediate action.
If it is discovered during an assessment that a child of school age is not attending school, the school should be contacted. If a child is not registered at a school, the Education Department should be contacted as soon as possible to establish the reason for this.
If at any stage it becomes clear that compulsory intervention may be necessary to meet the child's needs the social worker/manager will consult with the service manager, responsible for the MASH. This will be to explore whether it is necessary to make a referral to the Children's Convenor and/or to call a Legal Threshold meeting to explore an application to the Court.
Seeing the child
When children are seen, it is important that they are involved in the assessment. How this is done will depend on the age and ability of each child. Parents are usually willing for their children to be seen.
However, sometimes parents are not happy for their children to be involved, or seen alone. In this case there are four possible scenarios:
- In the case of a younger or less able child who is not suffering, or at risk of suffering, serious harm, the social worker should still try to see the child, with or without the parent. But the worker would not be able to insist, if the parent continues to refuse for the child to be seen.
- In the case of an older and competent child who wants to see the social worker and is not suffering, or at risk of suffering, serious harm, the child has the right to be seen and the social worker should see them. It may not be possible to complete an assessment without the agreement of the parents, but the social worker should make sure that the child is not suffering, or at risk of suffering, serious harm.
- In the case of a younger or less able child who may be suffering, or at risk of suffering, serious harm, the social worker must see the child alone, unless this is inappropriate, as would be the case with a very young child. If the parents continue to deny contact, the social worker should contact their manager. A strategy discussion should be held immediately to decide the best course of action.
- In the case of an older, competent child who wants to see the social worker and who may be suffering, or at risk of suffering, serious harm, the child has the right to be seen and the social worker should see them.
The findings of the assessment should be discussed with the child and their parents, and a copy of the completed Child's Plan should be given to them; if this is not done, the reasons must be clearly recorded.
A list of questions has been suggested for consideration when deciding whether a child understands something enough to make a decision about it:
- can the child understand the question they are being asked?
- does the child understand the main reasons for what is being proposed?
- does the child understand what choices they have to decide between?
- does the child understand what will happen if they choose each of the choices they can decide to take?
- can the child weigh up these different choices against each other?
- can the child tell you their personal choice, rather than repeating what someone else thinks they should do?
- can the child keep to one decision, without constantly changing their mind?
(Children's Rights Officer, England)
Exceptionally, a social worker or police officer may need to speak to a child without the knowledge of the parent. This could be because
- there is a possibility that a child could be threatened or otherwise coerced into silence
- there is a strong possibility that important evidence would be destroyed; or
- the child in question did not wish the parent to be involved at that stage and is competent to take that decision.
The strategy discussion should decide on the most appropriate timing of parental participation.
Lessons from research
Families often find an assessment anxiety-provoking and challenging. We need to remember that involuntary clients are more likely to be reluctant to work with us, or resistant to our suggestions. How well first contacts or enquiries go will influence the course of future work and affect the relationship between families and professionals.
Professionals tend to stress the procedural aspects of empowerment, for instance sharing information, attending meetings or making complaints. Families tend to place greater value on relational aspects around developing trust and being genuine, open, even-handed and sensitive. See Shemmings D and Shemmings Y: Empowering children and family members to participate in the assessment process, in The Child's World Reader, ed. Jan Horwath (2000).
You may also like
Working with children and families
It is important that wherever possible work is undertaken in partnership with families and that they are fully informed at all times of what is happening.Read more
Where the life of a child is at risk, or there is an imminent risk of serious harm, children's services or the police must act quickly to secure the immediate safety of the child.Read more
The purpose of a strategy discussion is to decide whether the threshold has been met for a single or joint agency (HSC and Police) child protection investigation, and to plan that investigation. They happen when it is believed a child has suffered, or is likely to suffer, serious harm.Read more
Child protection investigation
The primary purpose of the investigation is to establish the facts about what, if anything, has happened to the child and to assess the level of risk.Read more
Consideration should always be given to the need for a medical examination of each child for whom there are concerns about abuse.Read more
Joint child protection investigation - Achieving Best Evidence (ABE)
The investigation of child abuse is a crucial stage in protecting children. While other agencies will be involved in aspects of the investigation, the Police and Health and Social Care Service are primarily responsible.Read more
When there is a need to make an application to the Court, the Children and Family Community Services will take legal advice at the earliest opportunity.Read more
Outcome of investigations
There are three possible outcomes of a child protection investigation which will then determine if further work is required with the family and what this will look like.Read more
Vulnerable unborn baby - Pre-birth protocol
Young babies are particularly vulnerable to abuse and work carried out in the antenatal period can help minimise harm if there is early assessment, intervention and support.Read more
The Core Group
The core group is identified at the initial child protection conference. It is made up of the parents and the professionals who work most closely with the child.Read more
- Worried about a child?
- Case Conference
- After the Initial Case Conference
- Supplementary Guidance